Authors: Sophie Van Wambeke, Sarah Heynssens, Torsten Wiedeman
The Grim Reaper Cholera (year, date,!!)
In 19th-century Belgium, cholera swept through cities and countryside multiple times, leaving devastation in its wake. The poor suffered the most, but the severity of the disease meant that the wealthier social classes could not escape its grasp. Was it simply bad luck, or did deeper patterns of inequality determine who lived and who died?
Cholera entered Europe in the early 19th century, during the first global outbreak. The disease began spreading westward from Asia in the 1810s, carried by trade routes and the movement of armies and migrants. By 1831, cholera had reached the eastern edges of Europe, quickly moving through Russia and then into the heart of the continent.
The arrival of cholera marked a new era, as countries faced repeated and deadly outbreaks. Outbreaks were driven by increased global travel and rapid urbanization during the 19th century. As more people moved to cities, especially in industrializing regions, living conditions for the poor deteriorated, creating an environment where the disease could spread quickly.
For a long time, it was thought that bad odors – so-called “miasms” – caused the disease. Those smelly gasses rose from the numerous polluted waterways, or canals and streams in the cities, which often functioned as dumping grounds for human and animal waste.
In reality, cholera outbreaks were mainly caused by contaminated drinking water. Before the late 1800s, most people used shared wells and rivers for water.
In the 1850s, the English physician John Snow identified unsafe water as a source of contamination. However, the disease was not fully understood until 1884 when Robert Koch discovered that it is caused by the bacteria Vibrio cholerae. From then on, the transmission could be clarified.
Cholera is a waterborne bacterial infectious disease and is accompanied by symptoms such as vomiting and diarrhea, which can result in death from dehydration. Victims often develop a bluish skin color, making the disease known as the “blue death”.
Today, cholera is estimated to cause over 2 million cases and 90.000 deaths globally each year. The disease remains a challenge in areas where infrastructure for water and sewage is inexistent, insufficient or not functioning.
The WHO estimates that over 1.5 billion people don’t have access to safe sanitation, and 1.7 billion people consume water contaminated with faeces.
In Belgium, cholera caused seven big outbreaks, which exposed severe urban poverty and claimed many lives. In between these major outbreaks, the disease remained present, yet claimed few victims yearly.
In 1832, the disease caused the first epidemic in Belgium. In 1848, the country was hit by a second, particularly severe epidemic that struck a population already weakened by food crises. The deadliest outbreak occurred in 1866, resulting in a devastating loss of life. Four additional epidemics in the 19th and early 20th centuries were less severe and caused significantly fewer deaths compared to the two major outbreaks.
The epidemic of the year 1866 was the deadliest epidemic in Belgian history. The outbreak accounted for nearly 1 in 3 of all recorded deaths that year.
Cholera entered the country in March from different directions and claimed many victims until early December, with the highest numbers in the summer. The disease predominantly affected people living in the cities. Nearly 70% of deaths occurred in places with at least 5.000 inhabitants, and 40% of the disease cases were in places with 20.000 inhabitants or more. While some villages in the countryside were also affected heavily, particularly in xxxx, most were not.
Source: UGent Queteletcentrum, HISSTER databank; Documents statistiques de la Belgique, 1868.
The 1866 outbreak is by far the deadliest epidemic in Belgian history. But was it as deadly for everybody? Or were some more vulnerable to the disease? Let’s dive deeper into the data and have a look at the 1866 epidemic in Brussels and in rural areas.
As the map above shows, the city of Brussels was hit hard. In Brussels, 3.469 people died of cholera, which corresponds to 45% of all deaths in the year 1866. 21 per 1000 inhabitants died of cholera. What do we learn when we zoom in on the epidemic in Brussels? Where did the epidemic start? And who did it kill?
The graph below (graph 2) shows the victims day-by-day, from late May until mid-November.
Source: Archives of the City of Brussels, Police, red series 83-86
Who were the victims? Cholera caused many deaths among children below age 10 and among adults aged 20 to 49. However, these numbers can partly be explained by the fact that these were the biggest age groups. When we adjust for the number of people in each age group, a clearer pattern appears (graph 3): the highest risk of dying was in early childhood and older age (60 and above), while teenagers had the lowest risk. Men were a bit more at risk than women, except among those aged 60 to 79.
Source: UGENT LOKSTAT database; 1866 census; Archives of the City of Brussel, Police, red series 83-86.